http://PeopleString.com introduces itself as a new community with the motto: ''‘Where You Own the Web’''. 

It claims itself as "the new wave in relationship and social communities", combining "Creativity, Culture, Expressive Forums and places to meet new people and network". 

The most important part is, that the organization combines all the above features with "giving its members a share in the revenues that are collectively created on the website".
 
They challenge '''other 'social' sites''' by saying that they

* "keep all of the money for themselves and never give any to their users". 

* "are making millions off of your actions and keeping it all". 

PeopleString claims to be "unique for online social communities" by sharing the collectively generated revenues.


== Conversation ==

FridemarPache: Does somebody know here to verify (or refute) their claim:  "Who other than PeopleString gives its members back 70% of the revenues?". Doesn't WikiDot.com offer a similar model by sharing its Adsense income in a similar proportion?

HelmutLeitner: Whatever claims they make, it's unclear what such advertizing means. Maybe there are no revenues. Maybe this is a free will situation that can change any time. One can compare this to the phenomenon and problem of SocialBusiness. My son Thomas is just finishing a diploma work on how to institutionalize social business to make it credible. This needs a certain transparency and control by the community. In this case the ad incomes and the members that benefit should be known.