This is a free offer of the author for another OpenBusiness project, similar to StocksAtHome. It is meant to favor an income model for wikizens, who make a guessing game for the market value of domain-names, coupled to actual and potential digital goods and services in the community.

Currently at ca 2007/06/10 10:40 UTC, all [TLD]s domain-names are free to register, as the author checked:

You can leave your comments on the [StrongLink]ed comment section at [FlickerPhotoSharing:DomainsAtHome].

Must the author ask you on his knees to buy them, such that we can establish the pattern, as asked for by [SamRose]?

-- FridemarPache

Actions: And here is a first cue, where the idea came from a [DomainAppraisalGame], http://google.com/search?q=DomainAppraisalGame. -- [fridemar]

Discussion: The domain appraisal game at http://google.com/search?q=NameBio appears to only generate a list of ranked good guessers for evaluating the DomainNamesMarketValue http://google.com/search?q=DomainNamesMarketValue by comparing the guessed with the actual sell prices. Now imagine an open community-based appraisal system with built-in buy and sell recommendations (or even transactions), based on the best appraisal-peers of such an extended game. This would be another hybrid computing service, that includes HumanComputation http://google.com/search?q=HumanComputation. The author recommends to watch the video lecture on [HumanComputing] listed as [GoogleVideo].

... Peers replace "free?" by their DomainBasedRealName, as soon as they have it and they are going to work even more efficient than as an isolated HoofSmith. In the same way they may replace their Askprice

Note: The "owner" can be a single person or a group of, say number=100 peers, who bought the domain for say 0,0795 US$ per peer. When the domains are sold, then the total revenue is divided by number as a default. Now there are a number of peers, who as [VestedPeers]http://google.com/search?q=Vested+Peers are motivated to collaborate, developing the domain by delivering digital goods as: ideas, concepts, music, graphics, movies, programs round about the domain under a, say CreativeCommons license, what produces the fastest replication and spread over the Web. The group owner construct optimizes the forming of optimal teams by the dynamics of the IteratedPrisonersDilemma.http://google.com/search?q=IteratedPrisonersDilemma Don't expect from the initial author of DomainsAtHome, that he is going on to develop automatically more stuff on this special idea, until a third party rips off the domain for, say 50,000 US$, without having anything contributed to the wiki-community, than lurking. Even in this sad case, such an entreprenuer has done the community a good service to become aware of the value of [CreatingAndSharingWealthByMarketingDomainNamesCoupledToOpenCollaboration]. On the other hand, if the "Greifer" really builds such a community-service within the frame of an http://google.com/search?q=OpaqueBusiness, it will cost a lot more, than when built within the frame of an OpenBusiness. The consequence will be: The service-costs will be probably much higher.

-- [fridemar]

Fridemar, why do you allow yourself to use the term and concept of ownership here while asking me to not use the same? If you claim it is because you will never hold those properties artificially scarce, then how do you expect to "make money" from holding them?

I have much deeper issues with what you suggest, but they are no different from what I see as the fundamental (and really the only) problem with Capitalism, but I will save that for another time and place, as it certainly doesn't belong on this page.

-- PatrickAnderson

Patrick, the author is developing new ideas on CreatingAndSharingWealth. Hans opened a [new Diigo group] to discuss the topic in more detail, which can later be devided in two parts, if need arises: CreatingSharedWealth http://google.com/search?q=CreatingSharedWealth and SharingCreatedWealth http://google.com/search?q=SharingCreatedWealth in OnlineCommunities.

So, the question is, how can members of social collaboration communities create wealth, or if you prefer, P=PeerProfit [PeerProfit], by legally producing, selling and buying (mainly) digital goods and services?

In this approach we are not debating on "owners" of land, capital, labor in the old terms, that are overheated and full of aggression. Please don't let us repeat history with creating "new Kains, who kill Abels".

The question of how to monetarize the peer efforts is solved by creative inputs and courageous risktaking of the peers in projects like this, constantly adapting to the changing needs of the markets.

-- [fridemar]

Disclaimer: The authors of this page distance themselves from the content of all those links, that contain illegal or unethical content. The links given on this page, are only for the convenience of exploring the Web for similar, but legal ideas and openening up legal and ethical forms of explicit and IncidentalCollaboration. -- FridemarPache