InformationOverload is the problem of dealing with the sheer amount of information available. It is the common ground between sorting through the news, sorting through email spam, and the problem of how to build a search engine. It is the problem of reading articles on the web, and getting the feeling that each one was important and valuable, and then afterwards deciding that you spent too much time reading articles on the web. The first problem is that there is too much junk to sort through; the deeper problem is that there is too much good stuff to sort through.
As the amount of information increases, here are some bad aspects of InformationOverload:
For me, this is an information overload problem. The opinions of ordinary people in a republic (to a large extent) drive these sort of decisions. Yet few people have time to read lots of political commentary. That is enough of a problem in itself, but a further problem is that it is hard for people with a very limited amount of time to choose to read only good "summaries".
The problem is that, if something is 80% agreed on but it is a "hot issue", to anyone who just hears about the issue casually through the media, it will sound as if it is not settled at all and both sides are "equal". This is a consequence of the necessity of not shutting out the 20% side (after all, they may still turn out to be right).
How does one OrderChaos?
My diary [entry] for New York City was partially about InformationOverload. (More like advertisement overload.) I don't believe that it's a crisis because the world is already adapting to it. People are becoming more "media savvy", or at least media ignorant, by protecting their psyches from a bombardment of messages. Ignorance is not a big deal, because we can always learn what we need to know "just in time." (Compare with NoLogo) -- SunirShah
A very vaguely related concept is InformationLoss (this is the best place I could find to link from).
Ironically, there's another page on this subject at CommunityWiki:InformationOverload.
I spend more time these days glossing, skimming, and occasionally reading a broad and depth amount of material, most of which is interesting and worth relating to Meatball. I keep a lot of ideas in my head or on my memo pad (which is more available than the Internet), but I need a way of organizing it. Research blogs are popular amongst Ph.D.s who have to organize their reading over a long period of time, but they are not AppropriateMedia for the task of finding relationships between concepts, and their chronological ordering has nothing to do with the task of note-taking. I think wikis are a better model.
I also think that with all these researchers in the same field as I am suffering the same problem there is a serious need to combine resources so we don't all drown. Understandable summarizes, relationships between concepts, SocialNetwork?s, and lists of AcademicCitations constitute the majority of an academic's work, and this level of work can be shared. I have strong hopes for something along the lines of the GuildModel--or more simply stated, a wiki--to solve this problem. -- SunirShah, trying desperately to just-in-time learn at the Wizards of OS Conference
If there is a profitable demand, there is a business idea for it. There could be training companies that train workers and professors to take their materials and really make it easy to process versus some obtuse writing style. Companies who will take your work and then process the information to be easier to process for others.
One thing I find about wikis is that they are too easy to write in and become overloaded. It allows people to be mentally lazy when they write and not make it well processed writing. Lazy writing and the infinite loop nature of wikis can lead to people eating more than they can chew wandering the links to other pages. --MahyarMcDonald?
Funny thing is, to throttle InformationOverload, people would actually need more information. (Instructions, methods, programs, algorithms, contacts...) If you just step outside the flow and try to pick at the edges, you aren't likely to hit many good bits. More likely you'll just get spam.