(redirected from DiigoMe)
MeatballWiki |
RecentChanges |
Random Page |
Indices |
Categories
This
icon or alternatively
DiiGo is a
WikiPragma to
Notes:
- The Acronym Diigo is an abbreviation for Digest of Internet Information, Groups and Other stuff.
- DiiGoVideos lists videos about DiiGo. {At the same time a test, how DiiGo and TrailFire annotations embed videos}
Discussion:
Thank you Hans for this shorter WikiPragma and Diigo tag. -- FridemarPache
Ideas:
- _Understrokes as annotation markers_. How often did you see text with understrokes, clicked on it and became disappointed, because it was not clickable. Now that we have DiiGo, we can use understroked text (probablyavailable in a lot of wikis) to mark annotations. Here we test, if _Understrokes as annotation markers_ on different parts of the page allow different annotations.
- Diigo:wiki annotation footnotes markers [4]. As footnotes are probably available in more wikis, and because the useful built in counting mechanism, it appears to the author even better to use them as annotation markers.
- I think the idea of using some type of markup in this manner has considerable merit, if only because it provide non DiiGo users with some hints regarding what is being done.
- It may also help us avoid accidental damage to the search strings that DiiGo appears to be using to position its annotations on the page, since a non-DiiGo user could notice the delimiters and may therefore be aware that disturbing such a string could break an external DiiGo reference.
- With respect to the footnotes suggestion, I have to consider the [...] to be a 'specific' to a particular environment since I continue to strive for a common subset of markup that spans the wikis I use. This particular markup is used for bi-direction footnotes in WxWikiServer (which I use for most of my Private content and to create ('raw') static html pages. Hence, I have a small preference for the "_" delimiters (although I make extensive use of these as part of the Thought names in Wiki:TheBrain - some 25k pages worth.)
- My preliminary opinion is that it doesn't make too much difference what is used (especially if the strings are short) and that we shoul remain flexible given the emerging WikiCreole standards.
- -- HansWobbe
The following WikiPragma, at the bottom of the page, indicates actually that there are annotations on this page, tagged
appropriately with the tags of the DiigoService.
-- FridemarPache
Temporary work area created by HansWobbbe?
- WikiPragma/Novum: link to the special DiiGo page, where the flag combination has BackLinks to this and similar pages/DiiGo:/* _Understrokes as annotation markers_/* Diigo:wiki annotation footnotes markers As footnotes are probably available in more wikis, and because the useful built in counting mechanism, it appears to the author even better to use them as annotation markers.
- As footnotes are probably available in more wikis, and because the useful built in counting mechanism, it appears to the author even better to use them as annotation markers.
- -- taken from this page's "short digest".
Annotation Down Copy:
<copy>
For convenience of the annotation-blind-people and because the Beta of Diigo sometimes doesn't display the annotations, here is a downcopy of my last annotation for translation into French. Only annotation-enhanced people can see the formatted annotation in its full glory. Sorry.
WikiPragmaFr+WikiPragma+DiiGo+annotation+wiki
Bonjour, Christophe ( ChristopheDucamp): congratulations: you, HansWobbe and myself appear to be the first three people, who realize SocialAnnotations, i.e. interacting via annotations, communicating useful ideas, concepts, collaborating in this new public space of DiigoAnnotations?.
There are three methods to make your annotations private:
1. In the DiigoToolBox?? there is a resp. option box
2. In your DiigoBookmarksSection?? there are actions ("convert to private/public")
3. In the DiigoAnnotationDialogWindow??, when making a StickyNote?, there is an option box.
It could be possible, that you don't have the newest DiigoToolBox? FireFoxPlugin?? installed.
Of course, if there is another SocialAnnotationPartner??, you are welcome to join true SocialAnnotating?.
As soon as Diigo has enhanced its annotation service by a WikiEngine, we could easily find SocialAnnotationPartners?? by clicking the automatic link: SocialAnnotationPartnersWanted?.
Note:
All CamelCaseWikiWords? above got an automatic wiki link by DownCopy? and UpCopy? of the annotation into the MeatballWiki.
Post by fridemar 12-13-2006 Delete Edit
</copy>
There is a discussion on Diigo: Re Workaround using
TagCombinations [5]
Workaround for the missing WikiEngine in Diigo Annotations:
- Write your annotation first on a wiki page, that supports CamelCase wiki words and WikiPrefixes. Then
- make a DiigoBookmarkComment? to the WikiPage to be annotated, leaving there at least its TagCombination
- copy up the annotation and its TagCombination from the HTML-view into some DiigoStickyAnnotationDialogWindow?
- Submit the copied dialog window message
- Add the DiigoStickyAnnotation? to the DiigoBookmarkComments?, for backup, in case the basic annotation context gets lost
- enjoy a handmade exported WikiEngine functionality in the realm of Diigo Annotations.
===Start of Screenshot==========================================================================================
===End of Screenshot============================================================================================
Welcome Diigos, invited via the [WorkaroundForMissingWikiEngine Tip]
The following posting, I made to the Tips forum of
DiiGo, was lost as a forum entry, so using the concept of
CommunityWiki:MobileContent, I leave a copy here and forward the whole page to a safe email-account:
'(Meanwhile the author found it at
http://forum.diigo.com/topic/626#new). It was relocated without leaving a backlink.'
<copy>
Tip: Workaround for the missing WikiEngine in Diigo
Posted by Fridemar Pache
on 13.12.2006 16:37
Dear Diigos, dear Maggie, dear Diigo programmers:
on the wiki page MeatballWiki:DiiGo (if we had already a DiigoWiki?, I
wouldn't be forced to write explicitly the following ugly URL :-)
http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DiiGo
I demonstrated a workaround, enhancing the DiigoAnnotationSystem? by
WikiFeatures, not yet implemented.
The DiigoAnnotationSystem?, enhanced by a WikiEngine, is a
BreakThroughTechnology?, allowing true social annotations, where a rich
context of accumulated community wisdom allows efficient collaboration
by annotation.
I see a future, where the annotations become full blown up Webpages,
with their own URLs, that can be annotated themselves.
Thus the annotations over a base Web page can evolve into something,
that is of much higher value, than the underlying base page.
I envision a future, where the AnnotationSphere? becomes even more
important than
the current BlogoSphere.
DiiGo appears to be the first, realizing this goal.
I love DiiGo.
Fridemar
PS.:
Dear Diigo programmers, please don't forget to give exact UTC Date/Time
stamps for serious collaboration, because "time counts".
</copy>
On the [Diigo Sign-in page] you can find an annotation with the topic: CollaborationByAnnotation. As this is relevant for MeatballWiki and currently annotations cannot be addressed individually, the author copies it down to an addressable WikiPage for further elaboration.
TwinPages: [WardsWiki]
DiiGo [6],
Google
[7]:
DiiGo+wiki+annotation+
WikiPragma
HansWobbe annotation test area...
It may be useful for an author to have a cluster of annotation 'targets' in an unobtrusive area at the end of a page. (This positioning may conflict with the Style of some pages where (by convention) discussions & WkiMail
? are added at the end of the page.)'' This page segment is a bit of a test of these issues.
Hans, as we two are both users of
DiiGo and
TrailFire, you and all the other annotation-aware wikizens might want to use the synergies, that come from the
InteroperabilityOfDiigoAndTrailfire. --
[fridemar]
Test if it is possible to use the following script here, in Diigo or FireTrail annotations:
<a href="#" onclick="var
s=document.createElement('script');s.type='text/javascript';
s.src='http://www.diigo.com/javascripts/webtoolbar/diigolet_b_h_b.js';document.body.appendChild(s);"><img
style="border:none" alt="diigo it" src="" /></a>
-- fridemar
Negative! So we can only use this icon , to signal, that Diigo annotations are on the page.
1. Discussion snippets
This next block of text has been removed here from a prior annotation.
1.1. Fridemar & Hans
Fridemar...
I absolutely agree that Edit functions are essential.! I also think that is essential to be able to insert a link (like previous releases used to allow). And I find my self only using DiiGo for (non) Business purposes, since they cache the full contents of any page that is annotated and a lot of what I work on is constrained by Non Disclosure Agreements.
I quite like the idea of annotating and I am hopping to convince Maggie to release a "client side" version or a "firewalled" version, when I'm on the west coast next month. -- HansWobbe
CategoryWikiPragma